|
Delsys Inc
data analysis surface electromyography ![]() Data Analysis Surface Electromyography, supplied by Delsys Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/surface+electromyography+data+analysis/pm36561714-81-5-10?v=Delsys+Inc Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
data analysis surface electromyography - by Bioz Stars,
2026-08
97/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
MathWorks Inc
surface electromyography data analysis ![]() Surface Electromyography Data Analysis, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/surface+electromyography+data+analysis/pmc09044909-91-0-8?v=MathWorks+Inc Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
surface electromyography data analysis - by Bioz Stars,
2026-08
90/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
Journal: Frontiers in medicine
Article Title: Safety and efficacy of electrical stimulation for lower-extremity muscle weakness in intensive care unit 2019 Novel Coronavirus patients: A phase I double-blinded randomized controlled trial.
doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1017371
Figure Lengend Snippet: FIGURE 1 Study setup: electrical stimulation device, plugs and pads, and surface electromyography sensors. Participants received electrical stimulation through electrode adhesive pads placed on both proximal and distal gastrocnemius muscles using a bio-electric stimulation technology R⃝
Article Snippet: Equipment for muscular assessment and
Techniques: Adhesive, Muscles
Journal: Frontiers in medicine
Article Title: Safety and efficacy of electrical stimulation for lower-extremity muscle weakness in intensive care unit 2019 Novel Coronavirus patients: A phase I double-blinded randomized controlled trial.
doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1017371
Figure Lengend Snippet: FIGURE 2 A typical case comparison between a maximum voluntary contraction and involuntary contraction of the gastrocnemius muscle assessed via surface electromyogram. (A) Three 5–10 s dorsiflexion maximum voluntary contractions. (B) Three 5–10 s intervals of electrical stimulation set at 50 V. Both panels having a 5–10 s relaxation period between contractions.
Article Snippet: Equipment for muscular assessment and
Techniques: Comparison
Journal: Frontiers in medicine
Article Title: Safety and efficacy of electrical stimulation for lower-extremity muscle weakness in intensive care unit 2019 Novel Coronavirus patients: A phase I double-blinded randomized controlled trial.
doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1017371
Figure Lengend Snippet: FIGURE 4 Comparison of outcomes within and between groups through time. Ankles, ankle strength; kg, kilograms; GNMe, gastrocnemius muscle endurance; iEMG, integrated electromyography unit; MFS, Morse Fall Risk Scale. (A) Comparison of Ankles, and (B) GNMe within and between groups at 3 days from baseline. (C) Comparison of GNMe within and between groups at 9 days from baseline. (D) Comparison of MFS within and between groups at the time of intensive care unit (ICU) discharge (18.00 ± 10.19 days) from baseline; severity is proportional to high score. P-value and Cohen’s d effect size are noted from time group interaction at each determined time point.
Article Snippet: Equipment for muscular assessment and
Techniques: Comparison
Journal: Journal of biomechanics
Article Title: Neuromuscular Compensation Strategies Adopted at the Shoulder Following Bilateral Subpectoral Implant Breast Reconstruction
doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110348
Figure Lengend Snippet: Surface electromyography data were obtained from sixteen shoulder muscles while participants generated eight 3D isometric shoulder torques in five two-dimensional arm postures bilaterally. On the dominant arm, only upper trapezius activity differed between the groups (A). On the non-dominant arm, the sternocostal fiber region of the PM and upper trapezius activity differed between the groups (B). Bars represent mean ± standard error. Significant differences are visualized by colored bars and * signifies a significant group difference at p < 0.05.
Article Snippet:
Techniques: Muscles, Generated, Activity Assay